000			01529naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0062417314537
003			OSt
005			20190211173118.0
008			100624s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPENNINGS, Paul _941353
245	1	0	_aEuropean social democracy between planning and market : _ba comparative exploration of trends and variations
260			_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cDecember 1999
520	3		_aSince the 1970s many social democratic parties have moved in a neoliberal direction. This article examines the variations in the orientation of social democracy towards welfare state retrenchment. There are significant differences in this respect in thirteen Western European countries. Social democratic parties that opt for market solutions in socio-economic policy-making are mostly positioned in welfare state regimes with a strong planning tradition. The planning option is often chosen in countries with a strong market tradition. In both instances the goal is the same: striking the balance between planning and market in a mixed economy by adapting to changing socio-economic conditions. Most social democratic pledges in favour of market solutions are not signs of irreversible neo-liberalism, but merely attempts to assure the economic viability of welfare statism.
773	0	8	_tJournal of european Public Policy _g6, 5, p. 743-756 _dLondon : Routledge, December 1999 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100624 _b1731^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100629 _b1626^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34657 _d34657
041			_aeng