000 | 01658naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0062915335137 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173149.0 | ||
008 | 100629s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBANCHE, Ian _941387 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe extended gatekeeper : _bcentral government and the implementation of EC regional policy in the UK |
260 |
_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cMarch 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article evaluates the merits of multi-level governance as an explanatory model of EU decision-making. Regional policy implementation is a particularly good case study for evaluating multi-level governance for two reasons. First, because regional policy, along with other EC structural policies, is considered to be at 'the leading edge of multi-level governance'. And, second, because 'Multi-level governance is prominent in the implementation stage' (Marks et al . 1996: 365). The article presents evidence to suggest that while multi-level participation is a feature of EC regional policy implementation in the UK, it is less clear that this constitutes multi-level governance: central government remains dominant. Thus, where the intergovernmentalist 'gatekeeper' notion is useful in describing the behaviour of national governments in EU policy-making, it makes sense to refer to an extended gatekeeper that can operate at all stages of the policy process, including the contested sphere of policy implementation. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g6, 1, p. 28-45 _dLondon : Routledge, March 1999 _xISSN 13501763 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100629 _b1533^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100630 _b1608^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34716 _d34716 |
||
041 | _aeng |