000			01558naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0062915353637
003			OSt
005			20190211173150.0
008			100629s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPETERSON, John _935577
245	1	0	_aThe Santer era : _bthe european commission in normative, historical and theoretical perspective
260			_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cMarch 1999
520	3		_aThis article assesses the evolution of the European Commission's role, power and effectiveness in the post-Delors era. It develops four main arguments. First, the performance of the Commission should be judged by its ability to further the European Union's (EU's) basic objectives, defend the 'Community interest', offer leadership, and operate efficiently. Second, the early Delors Commissions were far more an exception in their strength than is Santer's in its weakness. Third, Santer promises to leave a legacy of a better managed Commission, but one that is also more fragmented and riven by sectoral and national rivalries. Fourth, theories of EU governance must be able to capture the 'actor-based' nature of EU policy-making, the lack of any dichotomy between the interests of 'national governments' and 'EU institutions', and the determinant effect of the political and economic environment in which the EU operates.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g6, 1, p. 46-65 _dLondon : Routledge, March 1999 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100629 _b1535^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100630 _b1608^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34717 _d34717
041			_aeng