000			01677naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0062916244037
003			OSt
005			20190211173158.0
008			100629s1996 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMAHER, Imelda _916240
245	1	0	_aLimitations on community regulation in the UK : _blegal culture and multi-level governance
260			_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cDecember 1996
520	3		_aThe implementation of EC law Britain is influenced by confluence between Community and national law and policy. At the same time, the trend towards greater centralization of policy and law-making in the UK is reinforced by EC law, both through the reporting systems introduced under new approach directives and the fact that central government is ultimately responsible under EC law for implementation. The primacy of the Community-member state axis weakens the Community system of indirect rule because it ignores the important enforcement role of local government, which in turn impedes the creation of the internal market, which itself is predicated on consistent enforcement practices throughout and between member states. The article first address what is meant by implementation and effectiveness before turning to a British study of implementation. It discusses the issue of concluence between the two legal orders and the nature of the relationship between national and local government in the context of implementation of directives.
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g3, 4, p. 577-593 _dLondon : Routledge, December 1996 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100629 _b1624^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100630 _b1616^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34728 _d34728
041			_aeng