000 | 01728naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0063016413437 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173302.0 | ||
008 | 100630s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSPANOU, Calliope _941439 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEuropean integration in administrative terms : _ba framework for analysis and the greek case |
260 |
_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cSeptember 1998 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe analysis of how national administrative systems respond to European integration requirements has so far focused mainly on formal/institutional aspects. Implicit assumptions based on the universality of Weberian-type bureaucracies tend to dominate the debate. It is expected that common constraints within the European Union (EU) might lead to administrative convergence. However, the point of departure of individual political administrative systems varies. Responsiveness is not only a matter of institutional reform. It is conditioned by a variety of extra-institutional, informal processes relative to state-society and politics-administration interaction. Adjustment initiatives follow pre-established paths and standard operating procedures and do not automatically lead to convergence. This framework is used to analyse the case of Greece. Research on the implementation of European directives highlights the informal aspects of the interaction with the local environment. It shows that the gap between formal rules and informal practices may favour or inhibit responsiveness. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g5, 3, p. 467-484 _dLondon : Routledge, September 1998 _xISSN 13501763 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100630 _b1641^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100706 _b1053^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34809 _d34809 |
||
041 | _aeng |