000 | 01877naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0063017020237 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173305.0 | ||
008 | 100630s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aWESSELS, Wolfgang _941442 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComitology : _bfusion in action. Politico-administrative trends in the EU system |
260 |
_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cJune 1998 |
||
520 | 3 | _aStudying the administrative infrastructure of the EU is an intriguing affair. Comitology committees, in particular, are significant indicators for analysing and assessing the evolution of the EU's administrative system. Relevant integration-related theories, however, offer several diverging analyses and assessments of their function and significance. Some of the existing empirical data denote considerable growth in administrative participation and a significant differentiation of procedures and forms, indicating a considerable Europeanization of national administrations. Insights into the behavioural patterns within committees indicate an interactive style in which the fundamental constitutional issues and the exact legal form are controversial, but where daily routine is characterized by business-like workings based on technocratic expertise and camaraderie, and geared to consensus among civil servants from several levels. Comparing realist, federalist, neo-functionalist and functionalist approaches, as well as erosion and governance views, the evolution of comitology committees can best be described as an indicator of a multi-level fusion process in action, leading to a yet undefined new stage in the evolution of West European states. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g5, 2, p. 209-234 _dLondon : Routledge, June 1998 _xISSN 13501763 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100630 _b1702^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100706 _b1054^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34814 _d34814 |
||
041 | _aeng |