000			01639naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0063017062837
003			OSt
005			20190211173306.0
008			100630s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLIEFFERINK, Duncan _923926
245	1	0	_aStrategies of the 'green' member states in EU environmental policy-making
260			_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _cJune 1998
520	3		_aThis article investigates the strategies of the 'leaders' in EU environmental policy-making. A typology of strategies of influencing EU environmental policy is introduced, distinguishing between different kinds of 'pushers' and 'forerunners'. With the help of this typology, the positions and strategies of the 'green' member states after the accession of Sweden, Finland and Austria are analysed. It is concluded, among other things, that differences in strategies of articulating environmentally progressive positions in the EU may seriously thwart effective alliance-building between the 'leaders'. Denmark is identified as the most activist 'green' member state. In Sweden and Austria, pragmatism now prevails. The Netherlands and Finland have the most constructive approach. Germany has largely abandoned its activism of the 1980s in favour of more defensive tendencies. Because of its political and economic impact, the role of Germany is crucial among the 'green' member states.
700	1		_aANDERSEN, Mikael Skou _941443
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g5, 2, p. 254-270 _dLondon : Routledge, June 1998 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100630 _b1706^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100706 _b1054^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34816 _d34816
041			_aeng