000 | 01566naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0070216095337 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173401.0 | ||
008 | 100702s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aEVERA, Stephen Van _941518 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aAssessing US strategy in the war on terror |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aAl Qaeda and its jihadi allies pose a large threat to U.S. national security. Such a grave menace requires a strong response. Yet the United States has so far waged only a one-dimensional war against al Qaeda, fighting hard on one front when it should be fighting on four. Specifically, the Bush administration has focused heavily on an offensive campaign against al Qaeda overseas while neglecting three other critical fronts: bolstering homeland defense, securing weapons and materials of mass destruction from possible theft or purchase by terrorists, and winning the war of ideas. And the administration has sometimes done too little even on the offensive, instead diverting itself into a costly and counterproductive sideshow in Iraq. The public credits President Bush for toughness on terror. In fact, his administration has pursued a half-hearted war on terror, failing to devote the political and financial resources it requires. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g607, p. 10-26 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100702 _b1609^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100706 _b1137^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34895 _d34895 |
||
041 | _aeng |