000 | 01159naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0070216195637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173405.0 | ||
008 | 100702s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKOKOSHIN, Andrei _941523 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA nuclear response to nuclear terror : _breflections of nuclear preemption |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe threat of nuclear terrorism in the United States has led its leadership to contemplate an extreme military responsenamely, nuclear preemption. To some preemption proponents, nuclear weapons are no longer considered the option of last resort. This article argues that reducing the nuclear threshold for some international actors and not others is perhaps just as dangerous as the proliferation the nuclear preemption doctrine is trying counter. The nuclear "taboo" has once again ceased to exist. | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g607, p. 59-63 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100702 _b1619^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100706 _b1138^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34900 _d34900 |
||
041 | _aeng |