000 | 01723naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0070614502837 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173417.0 | ||
008 | 100706s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSINHA, Manisha _941541 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aHow can power discourses be changed? Contrasting the 'daughter deficit' policy of the Delhi government with Gandhi and king's transformational reframing |
260 |
_aOxon : _bRoutledge, _cout./dez. 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aSocial policy impact is partly determined by how policy is articulated and advocated, including which values are highlighted and how. In this paper, we examine the influence of policy framing and reframing on outcomes, with particular reference to the policies of the Delhi state government in India that target the practices of female feticide, infanticide and neglect that underlie the 'daughter deficit'. Using Snow and Benford's categories for understanding reframing processes, the paper outlines and applies a 'model' of reframing disputed issues derived from looking at two famous campaigns - Gandhi's 1930 Salt March in the struggle for Indian freedom from British rule and the African-American civil rights struggle of the 1950s and 1960s. It argues that 'carrot and stick' policy measures, such as financial incentives and legal prohibitions, to counteract the 'daughter deficit' must be complemented by well crafted discursive interventions. | |
590 | _aVolume 3 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 3-4 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aGASPER, Des _941542 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tCritical Policy Studies _g3, 3-4, p. 290-308 _dOxon : Routledge, out./dez. 2009 _xISSN 19460171 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100706 _b1450^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100709 _b1137^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c34919 _d34919 |
||
041 | _aeng |