000			01669naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0071516264137
003			OSt
005			20190211173440.0
008			100715s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aZIMRING, Franklin E. _941623
245	1	0	_aPublic opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cMay 2006
520	3		_aIt is unlikely that hostile attitudes about criminals or beliefs that punishments for crime were too lenient were the major causes of the explosive increase in punishments in the United States after 1970. Public hostility toward criminals has been a consistent theme in this country for a long time, but it did not cause big increases in imprisonment before 1970 in the United States or large expansions of incarceration elsewhere. In this article, the authors argue that growth in the salience of crime as a citizen concern and increasing public distrust of government competence and legitimacy were two of a number of changes that transformed ever-present hostile attitudes into a dynamic force in American politics. Negative attitudes toward offenders are a necessary condition for anticrime crusades, but they are always present. It was the addition of fear and distrust into the law and politics of punishment setting that produced the perfect storm of punitive expansion.
700	1		_aJOHNSON, David T. _941624
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g605, p. 266-280 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, May 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100715 _b1626^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100803 _b1048^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35047 _d35047
041			_aeng