000			01535naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0071609365237
003			OSt
005			20190211173445.0
008			100716s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aROBINS, Lee N. _941635
245	1	0	_aExplaining when arrests end for serious juvenile offenders : _bcomments on the sampson and laub study
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cNovember 2005
520	3		_aThis article comments on the article by Sampson and Laub in this issue. It congratulates them on locating and interviewing at approximately age seventy a large proportion of the survivors of the Glueck and Glueck (1968) study. It also points out problems, some resulting from the impact of privacy regulations. Other problems arose from the age of the subjects at follow-up, resulting in half being already deceased; from askingmento explain their desistance from crime, when they may not understand it themselves; and from the methods of testing childhood predictors of desistance. The study results apply only to serious juvenile delinquents and cannot be assumed to generalize to crime in general, including that which begins later and includes white-collar criminals. Preliminary studies to serve as the basis for such a broad approach are suggested.
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g602, p. 57-72 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, November 2005 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100716 _b0936^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100803 _b1058^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35057 _d35057
041			_aeng