000 | 01768naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0071916060337 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173507.0 | ||
008 | 100719s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPOPPELAARS, Caelesta _941668 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTwo words apart : _bthe divergence of national and local immigrant integration policies in the Netherlands |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aImmigrant integration has become an intractable policy controversy in the Netherlands. One facet of this controversy involves the different ways in which immigrant integration has been framed by national and local governments. National government has formulated a "citizenship approach" to immigrant integration, whereas local governments often chose a more accommodative approach to migrant groups. In this article, the authors argue that this discrepancy originates from the divergent institutional logic of national and local integration policies. National integration policies have resulted from belief in strong central policy coordination, a sharp turn from depoliticization to politicization, responsiveness to a series of focus events, and mood swings during the past decades. Local integration policies, in contrast, are characterized by a considerable degree of pragmatic problem coping, in particular, the instrumental use of migrant organizations. As such, the divergent logics of national and local integration policies seem to represent two different worlds of problem framing | |
700 | 1 |
_aSCHOLTEN, Peter _929392 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAdministration & Society _g40, 4, p. 335-357 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2008 _xISSN 00953997 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100719 _b1606^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100805 _b1524^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35110 _d35110 |
||
041 | _aeng |