000 | 01443naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0090113294637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141812.0 | ||
008 | 100901s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMORRIS, Ben _942013 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLa régulation de la concurrence au Royaume-Uni - de la flexibilité administrative à la juridification |
260 |
_aParis : _bENA, _c2005 |
||
520 | 3 | _aAlthough the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), the main institution in charge of competition regulation, has remained the same, in the past ten years the United Kingdom has known two completely different, if not opposed types of regulation. Before 1998, competition was subjected to the same kind of regulation as that which existed in other areas : informal, non-legal, relying mainly on negotiation and persuasion and using the threat of prosecution as a negotiating argument. However, since 1998, the introduction of Community law into the UK system has radically changed the mode of competition regulation. It has become much less flexible and is now characterised by considerable juridification : law plays a central role in regulation, providing a formal framework in which law suits and appeals are common procedures | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g114, p. 309-322 _dParis : ENA, 2005 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100901 _b1329^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100902 _b1118^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35918 _d35918 |
||
041 | _afre |