000 | 01404naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0090114475837 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141814.0 | ||
008 | 100901s2004 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aDODDS, Anneliese _939517 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLe développment des agences en Grance-Bretagne et en France - l'exemple d'ÉduFrance, transfer d'outre-Manche ou création indigène? |
260 |
_aParis : _bENA, _c2004 |
||
520 | 3 | _aDoes the creation of an instrument of public policy with the identical name and structure it had in another country constitute a transfer of public policy ? Similarity of label and format may mask a multitude of differences between apparently identical institutional forms. In both British and French administration, agencies have more and more clearly become a major tool of public policy. Their development has often been attributed to the international diffusion of New Public Management methods. Nonetheless, as this study reveals, a comparison between two agencies, EduFrance (France) and Educating Counselling Service (GB), shows that the proliferation of these instruments is not necessarily indicative of international policy convergence | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g111, p. 483-500 _dParis : ENA, 2004 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100901 _b1447^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100902 _b1106^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35948 _d35948 |
||
041 | _afre |