000			01649naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0090210544137
003			OSt
005			20190218141815.0
008			100902s2000 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d
100	1		_aGRÉMION, Catherine _942056
245	1	0	_aLes paradoxes du corps préfectoral
260			_aParis : _bIIAP, _coct./déc. 2000
520	3		_aThere are two dates which stand out in the history of the institutions of the prefect during the Fifth Republic. First, the reform of 1964 had the objective of giving the prefect an authority over State services at local level. In fact, as 'holder of all ministers' 'powers', the prefect in practice would be brough into confrontation with heads of service from the different ministers, strengthened by delegation from their various ministers. This reform also created a new organisation, the region, at the head of which is a regional prefect, who is prefect of the department's territorial administrative centre. Secondly, decentralisation in 1982, while strengthening the prefect's powers over State services, has radically altered the content of its activities at the heart of administrative territories: prefects are no longer their guardian nor the executive of departments and regions: they must reposition themselves in response to new local authorities elected by universal suffrage, while the instability of their office over time does them a disservice
773	0	8	_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g96, p. 555-564 _dParis : IIAP, oct./déc. 2000 _xISSN 01527401 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100902 _b1054^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100915 _b1109^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c35977 _d35977
041			_afre