000			01252naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0090615063637
003			OSt
005			20190218141820.0
008			100906s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d
100	1		_aSERNIA, Francesco _942111
245	1	0	_aLes moyens de l'indépendance
260			_aParis : _bIIAP, _cavril/juin 1999
520	3		_aIn Europe, the normative guarantees which apply to supreme audit institutions are numerous and very often are contained within the Constitution or organic laws. Autonomy of budgetary management is widely respected and is also a factos ensuring independence. However, some expenditure may be subjected to particular restrictions. While the heads of these institutions enjoy their autonomy, this does not always correspond with that of the rest of their personnel, particularly those employees who assist in applaying the control mechanisms. Generally speaking, there is a notably persistent tendency of the administration to intervene indirectly in order to influence matters
773	0	8	_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g90, p. 249-260 _dParis : IIAP, avril/juin 1999 _xISSN 01527401 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100906 _b1506^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100915 _b1132^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36040 _d36040
041			_afre