000 | 01252naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0090616154037 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141821.0 | ||
008 | 100906s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPOULLET, Yves _942120 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aL'autorité de contrôle : _b'vues' de Bruxelles |
260 |
_aParis : _bIIAP, _cjanv./mars 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aAn examination of the situation in several countries (Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and the UK) with regard to the provisions of the European directive concerning the supervisory authorities reveals the stakes involved in the directive's transposition into domestic legal order. The decision of these supervisory bodies will in future be obligatory and therefore susceptible to judicial review. Their independence, which has been reinforced, leads to prioritisation of functional as opposed to organic criteria. New challenges emerge when putting into operation these provisions: such as co-operation, technical expertise and the risk of sectorisation | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g89, p. 69-82 _dParis : IIAP, janv./mars 1999 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100906 _b1615^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100915 _b1135^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36054 _d36054 |
||
041 | _afre |