000			01607naa a2200181uu 4500
001			0090914384537
003			OSt
005			20190218141824.0
008			100909s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d
100	1		_aMEYERSON, Denise _942152
245	1	0	_aLire la Constitution à travers le prisme de la philosophie morale
260			_aParis : _bIIAP, _cjanv/./mars 1998
520	3		_aAccording to the Constitutions, limitations to constitutional rights should not infringe the values of dignity, equality and freedom. This requires that the objectives of the state be submitted to a form of control which guarantees all citizens a significant degree of protection against state coercion. The state is obliged to justify any limit imposed upon a right which is protected by the Constitution in neural terms, or in terms to which any reasonable citizen would attach a certain weight. Analysis of the implications of this test in the areas of freedom of religion and freedom of expression must not obscure the fact that control is of a general nature and may apply in numerous other areas as well. Finally, the obligation for the state to observe a certain neutrality has nothing to do with moral neutrality, neither with respect to the state's position in the face of social and economic inequalitites, nor with regard to the consequences of these inequalitites on political life
773	0	8	_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g85, p. 87-96 _dParis : IIAP, janv/./mars 1998 _xISSN 01527401 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20100909 _b1438^b _cDaiane
998			_a20100915 _b1155^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36133 _d36133
041			_afre