000 | 01096naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0092311073637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141835.0 | ||
008 | 100923s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBERMANN, George _942310 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLa codification aux États-Unis |
260 |
_aParis : _bIIAP, _cavril/juin 1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe lack of recognition given to codification in the United States is a reflection of the role played by the common law in the legal system which prohibits a legal text from being considered the exclusive or universal source of law in a particular area. Certain objectives of codification (unity, transparency, coherence) are sought by other means (model or standard-form statutes, restatements, Law Revision Commission), but systematisation remains for the moment a preoccupation which is alien to the American system | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g82, p. 221-226 _dParis : IIAP, avril/juin 1997 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100923 _b1107^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20100928 _b1452^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36412 _d36412 |
||
041 | _afre |