000 | 01592naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0093014183937 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141844.0 | ||
008 | 100930s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPIRNAT, Rajko _942414 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA la recherche d'un droit du domaine public : _bl'exemple de la Slovénie |
260 |
_aParis : _bIIAP, _cavril/juin 1995 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn countries where the social property is predominant, whether it is State property or collective property, the creation, after the change of regime, of a public property was something completely new. In Yougoslavia, there were some basic rules on State property, but they were used as the constitutional foundations of nationalization and expropriation. After 1990, in Slovenia, it was necessary to decide what in State property was to be excluded from the denationalization. Among public property goods, the goods for everybody's use have to be available, according to the Slovene law. On the other hand, the law does no say if the goods necessary to the public service have to be put in public property. Generally speaking, the Slovene system seems to evolve towards a submission to civil law, with only some special limitation, like the German system. However, these limitations being numerous, the definition of a general framework for public property is still necessary | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g74, p. 251-258 _dParis : IIAP, avril/juin 1995 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20100930 _b1418^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20101006 _b1720^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36567 _d36567 |
||
041 | _afre |