000 | 01929naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0100515415437 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141850.0 | ||
008 | 101005s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSOLTANI, Ebrahim _924581 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe rhetoric and reality of 'process control' in organisational environments with a TQM orientation : _bthe managers' view |
260 |
_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cJan./Feb. 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis paper offers a defence of total quality management (TQM) initiatives as an integral part of business strategy for maintaining competitive advantage. It takes issue with one argument against it: that there exist ambiguity and contradiction in using 'process control' to exert control over the workforce to bring about the desired outcomes of TQM, and therefore it might be seen as a follow-up to scientific management. The paper adopts a qualitative approach in the form of three case studies. Data from 47 managers representing a variety of managerial levels indicate that the increased control over the workforce is indirect through the increased control over the work process, and that TQM initiatives can be used as the vehicle for achieving what most of the managers search for: higher organisational performance through more effective use of the capabilities and inclinations of their workforce. However, the study further highlights the danger that the promised TQM benefits could be vulnerable to management bias towards control, leading to its failure in the long term | |
590 | _aVolume 21 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 1-2 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aSINGH, Abhilasha _934988 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aYING-YING, Liao _942485 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aWEI-YUAN, Wang _942486 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence _g21, 1-2, p. 67-78 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, Jan./Feb. 2010 _xISSN 14783363 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20101005 _b1541^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20101006 _b1735^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36677 _d36677 |
||
041 | _afre |