000 | 01956naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0102015445237 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211173838.0 | ||
008 | 101020s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFELDMAN, Martha S. _93424 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aReconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change |
260 |
_aIthaca : _bJohnson Graduate School of Management, _cMarch 2003 |
||
520 | 3 | _aIn this paper, we challenge the traditional understanding of organizational routines as creating inertia in organizations. We adapt Latour's distinction between ostensive and performative to build a theory that explains why routines are a source of change as well as stability. The ostensive aspect of a routine embodies what we typically think of as the structure. The performative aspect embodies the specific actions, by specific people, at specific times and places, that bring the routine to life. We argue that the ostensive aspect enables people to guide, account for, and refer to specific performances of a routine, and the performative aspect creates, maintains, and modifies the ostensive aspect of the routine. We argue that the relationship between ostensive and performative aspects of routines creates an on-going opportunity for variation, selection, and retention of new practices and patterns of action within routines and allows routines to generate a wide range of outcomes, from apparent stability to considerable change. This revised ontology of organizational routines provides a better explanation of empirical findings than existing theories of routines and has implications for a wide range of organizational theories | |
700 | 1 |
_aPENTLAND, Brian T _942789 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAdministrative Science Quarterly _g48, 1, p. 94-118 _dIthaca : Johnson Graduate School of Management, March 2003 _xISSN 00018392 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20101020 _b1544^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20101027 _b1644^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c36999 _d36999 |
||
041 | _aeng |