000 01620naa a2200205uu 4500
001 0120616575337
003 OSt
005 20190211173920.0
008 101206s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aROSENTRAUB, Mark S.
_99213
245 1 0 _aResidential property tax abatments and rebuilding in Cleveland, Ohio
260 _aThousand Oaks :
_bSAGE,
_cAugust 2010
520 3 _aIn the late 1980s the city of Cleveland began offering residential property tax abatements in an effort to (1) reduce blight, (2) attract home owners, and (3) build upon the momentum established by the construction of several downtown attractions. When Cleveland’s legislation authorizing part of the abatement program was to be renewed in 2005, a new mayor asked for an assessment of the program’s status and its fiscal effects. Utilizing property tax and assessment files and a survey of individuals who had purchased a home that received the property tax abatement, this study finds that Cleveland’s investment through forgone property taxes will likely result in overall fiscal gains for the city. Despite this success, property tax abatements, even coupled with the building of an impressive set of cultural amenities, have yet to reverse the demographic and economic trends that have plagued Cleveland for more than fifty years
700 1 _aMIKELBANK, Brian
_943169
700 1 _aPOST, Charlie
_943170
773 0 8 _tState and Local Government Review
_g42, 2, p. 104-117
_dThousand Oaks : SAGE, August 2010
_xISSN 0160323X
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20101206
_b1657^b
_cDaiane
998 _a20101209
_b1618^b
_cCarolina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c37609
_d37609
041 _aeng