000			01653naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0120716280337
003			OSt
005			20190211173939.0
008			101207s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBRANDSMA, Gijs Jan _943192
245	1	0	_aThe EU comitology system : _bwhat role for the commission?
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cJune 2010
520	3		_aThe literature on comitology has largely ignored the European Commission's actual behaviour in the daily workings of the numerous comitology committees that were designed to control it. On the basis of survey data of Danish and Dutch representatives on nearly all comitology committees, this paper investigates the Commission's role in the system. We find that the Commission acts both as a mediator and as a policy advocate, but to varying degrees. We take a first step towards understanding this behaviour by an inspection of four arguments found in the literature on comitology and the Commission: the constraining or enabling impact of the comitology procedures; the institutional position of the responsible Directorate-General; the nature of the cases dealt with by the committees and, finally, the intensity of the member states' preferences in relation to the committees' cases. In comitology, each of these arguments shapes the mediating or the advocating behaviour of the Commission
700	1		_aBLOM-HANSEN, Jens _923900
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g88, 2, p. 496-512 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, June 2010 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101207 _b1628^b _cDaiane
998			_a20101217 _b1128^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37630 _d37630
041			_aeng