000			01957naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0120811551541
003			OSt
005			20190211173949.0
008			101208s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aTAYLOR-GOOBY, Peter _910548
245	1	0	_aFairness, equality and legitimacy : _ba qualitative comparative study of Germany and the UK
260			_aOxford : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cFebruary 2010
520	3		_aThe pressures of globalization and shifts towards post-industrialism are producing policies that increasingly emphasize the common themes of activation and of individual responsibility for outcomes. Such approaches suggest normative principles of equality of opportunity rather than of outcome, and of individual rather than collective responsibility for the outcomes achieved. Does this imply a shift towards a common normative framework for European welfare states, with implications for future policy developments? This article reports a recent qualitative study examining ideas about fairness and social provision in the very different regimes of Germany and the UK. The analysis shows that while respondents in both countries value equality of opportunity as a normative principle, those in Germany are much more likely to argue that an equal opportunity approach requires government to guarantee equal access to basic services. They are also more likely to express concerns about market freedoms which allow those who can afford it better access to health care and education. Real differences in welfare values remain, loosely following differences of regime type, despite the greater emphasis on activation and individual responsibility across European welfare states
700	1		_aMARTIN, Rose _943208
773	0	8	_tSocial Policy & Administration _g44, 1, p. 85-103 _dOxford : Wiley-Blackwell, February 2010 _xISSN 01445596 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101208 _b1155^b _cJaqueline
998			_a20110118 _b1743^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37648 _d37648
041			_aeng