000			01767naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0121416184937
003			OSt
005			20190517101637.0
008			101214s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCORLEY, Elizabeth A. _943357
245	1	0	_aScholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration : _banalysing recent trends
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cSeptember 2010
520	3		_aPrevious studies have confirmed the interdisciplinary nature of the field of public administration (Mosher 1956; Ventriss 1991; Forrester 1996; Rodgers and Rodgers 2000; Schroeder et al. 2004) and encouraged the exploration of one important indicator of interdisciplinarity: research collaboration. One way that collaboration patterns are explored is through the study of co-authorship among faculty members (Smart and Bayer 1986; Forrester 1996; Katz and Martin 1997). In the field of public administration, studies on co-authorship and productivity of scholars are sparse. In this article, we use bibliometric data to explore collaboration patterns as they relate to productivity levels and quality of publications within the field of public administration. Our study finds that more productive scholars, as well as those with the highest impact, are less likely to collaborate than their colleagues. Our results also indicate that there are gender differences in collaboration patterns and productivity within the field of public administration
700	1		_943358 _aSabharwal, Meghna
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g88, 3, p. 627-648 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, September 2010 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101214 _b1618^b _cDaiane
998			_a20101217 _b1718^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37750 _d37750
041			_aeng