000			01742naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0121416205637
003			OSt
005			20190211174128.0
008			101214s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aJOHANSSON, Karl magnus _936269
245	1	0	_aOrganizing the core executive for european union affairs : _bcomparing Finland and Sweden
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cSeptember 2010
520	3		_aExamining core executive organization for EU affairs in Finland and Sweden, this article uncovers how change agents used European integration deliberately to strengthen their role in the domestic settings through taking control of EU policy co-ordination. In both countries, EU membership was an exogenous factor that enabled the offices of the PM to secure a more powerful position and advance their own institutional agendas. This strengthened their leadership role and weakened the respective foreign ministries, whose legitimacy in EU co-ordination was undermined by the discourse that matters pertaining to this co-ordination should be treated as domestic policy instead of foreign policy. This discourse proved instrumental in the organizational reforms and core executive restructuring. Both countries also provide evidence of intra-Nordic organizational learning since the Finnish co-ordination system was based on lessons drawn from Denmark whereas the subsequent Swedish reform was inspired and legitimized by changes in Finland
700	1		_aRAUNIO, Tapio _941288
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g88, 3, p. 649-664 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, September 2010 _xISSN 00333298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101214 _b1620^b _cDaiane
998			_a20101217 _b1719^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37751 _d37751
041			_aeng