000 | 01811naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0121416231737 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211174129.0 | ||
008 | 101214s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLAVOIE, Josée _943359 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAnalysing contractual environments : _blessons from indigenous health in Canada, Australia and New Zealand |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cSeptember 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aContracting in health care is a mechanism used by the governments of Canada, Australia and New Zealand to improve the participation of marginalized populations in primary health care and improve responsiveness to local needs. As a result, complex contractual environments have emerged. The literature on contracting in health has tended to focus on the pros and cons of classical versus relational contracts from the funder's perspective. This article proposes an analytical framework to explore the strengths and weaknesses of contractual environments that depend on a number of classical contracts, a single relational contract or a mix of the two. Examples from indigenous contracting environments are used to inform the elaboration of the framework. Results show that contractual environments that rely on a multiplicity of specific contracts are administratively onerous, while constraining opportunities for local responsiveness. Contractual environments dominated by a single relational contract produce a more flexible and administratively streamlined system | |
700 | 1 |
_aBOULTON, Amohia _943360 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDWYER, Judith _943361 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g88, 3, p. 665-679 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, September 2010 _xISSN 00333298 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20101214 _b1623^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20101217 _b1719^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37752 _d37752 |
||
041 | _aeng |