000			01580naa a2200205uu 4500
001			0121514395337
003			OSt
005			20190211174209.0
008			101215s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aPAULUS, Alari _943414
245	1	0	_aThe distributional impact of in-kind public benefits in european countries
260			_aHoboken : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cSpring 2010
520	3		_aInternational comparisons of inequality based on measures of disposable income may not be valid if the size and incidence of publicly provided in-kind benefits differ across the countries considered. The benefits that are financed by taxation in one country may need to be purchased out of disposable income in another. We estimate the size and incidence of in-kind or “noncash” benefits from public housing subsidies, education, and health care for five European countries using comparable methods and data. Inequality in the augmented income measure is dramatically lower than in disposable income, with the effects of the three components varying in importance across countries. Adapting equivalence scales to take proper account of differences in needs for health care and education across population members reduces the scale of the effect, but does not eliminate it
700	1		_aSUTHERLAND, Holly _943415
700	1		_aTSAKLOGLOU, Panos _943416
773	0	8	_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g29, 2, p. 243-266 _dHoboken : Wiley-Blackwell, Spring 2010 _xISSN 02768739 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101215 _b1439^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110118 _b1733^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37791 _d37791
041			_aeng