000			01965naa a2200193uu 4500
001			0121515523237
003			OSt
005			20190211174220.0
008			101215s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMELTZER, Rachel _943438
245	1	0	_aWhat drives the diffusion of inclusionary zoning?
260			_aHoboken : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cSummer 2010
520	3		_aSocial scientists offer competing theories on what explains the policymaking process. These typically include economic rationalism, political competition or power struggles, and policy imitation of the kind that diffuses across spatially proximate neighbors. In this paper, we examine the factors that have influenced a recent local policy trend in California: inclusionary zoning (IZ). IZ programs require developers to make a certain percentage of the units within their market-rate residential developments affordable to low- or moderate-income households. By 2007, 68 percent of jurisdictions in the San Francisco Bay Area had adopted some type of IZ policy. We test the relative importance of economic, political, and spatial factors in explaining the rapid diffusion of IZ, across 100 cities and towns in the Bay Area. Consistent with an economic efficiency argument, results of hazard models provide some evidence that IZ is adopted in places with less affordable housing. However, political factors, such as partisan affiliation and the strength of affordable housing nonprofits, are even more robust predictors of whether or not a local government adopts IZ. There is no evidence of spatial diffusion in the case of IZ adoption; jurisdictions are not, on average, responding to the behavior of their neighbors
700	1		_aSCHUETZ, Jenny _939459
773	0	8	_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g29, 3, p. 578-602 _dHoboken : Wiley-Blackwell, Summer 2010 _xISSN 02768739 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101215 _b1552^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110118 _b1739^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37803 _d37803
041			_aeng