000			01545naa a2200205uu 4500
001			0121516035537
003			OSt
005			20190211174225.0
008			101215s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBANZHAF, H. Spencer _943448
245	1	0	_aSuccess and design of local referenda for land conservation
260			_aHoboken : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cFall 2010
520	3		_aFrom 1998 to 2006, over three-quarters of the more than 1,550 U.S. referenda targeting open space passed. We analyze the success of the conservation movement at holding referenda in areas with greater ecological value and greater likelihood of supporting conservation. To do so, we first analyze the patterns in where referenda are held and in which finance mechanisms they employ. Controlling for these two selection patterns, we then investigate the factors determining the success of the referenda. Our findings suggest that conservation groups are pursuing a successful strategy, targeting communities with above-average probabilities of passing referenda and higher ecological value. Nevertheless, our results suggest that overlooked opportunities exist in minority and middle-class neighborhoods, in suburban fringe areas, and in the Southeast
700	1		_aOATES, Wallace E. _97845
700	1		_aSANCHIRICO, James N _943449
773	0	8	_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g29, 4, p. 769-798 _dHoboken : Wiley-Blackwell, Fall 2010 _xISSN 02768739 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20101215 _b1603^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110118 _b1725^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c37808 _d37808
041			_aeng