000 01674naa a2200229uu 4500
001 0122011051141
003 OSt
005 20190211174323.0
008 101220s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aMAOR, Moshe
_96596
245 1 0 _aOrganizational reputation and jurisdictional claims :
_bthe case of the U.S. food and drug administration
260 _aMalden :
_bWiley-Blackwell,
_cjan. 2010
520 3 _aWhen do regulatory agencies expand, following the emergence of novel technologies? This article presents a verbal model that suggests that a regulator is most likely to announce that it has statutory authority to regulate a novel technology when its reputation is at stake. This is most likely to occur when (1) new information becomes available to the regulator regarding the seriousness of the anticipated harm of a novel technology, or (2) a rival regulator attempts to formalize its regulatory authority or fails to do so although officially required to. A historical–institutional analysis of the temporal process leading to jurisdictional claims by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration over gene therapy, laboratory-developed complex diagnostic tests, human tissue transplants, and human cloning supports the model's prediction
650 4 _aTecnologia da Informação
_911936
650 4 _aRegulação
_912883
650 4 _aSaúde
_912897
773 0 8 _tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions
_g23, 1, p. 133-160
_dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, jan. 2010
_xISSN 09521895
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20101220
_b1105^b
_cJaqueline
998 _a20110131
_b1146^b
_cKeicielle
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c37869
_d37869
041 _aeng