000 | 01982naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1010711201837 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240718173552.0 | ||
008 | 110107s1982 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_931614 _aTimsit, Gérard |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLe modèle occidentale d'administration |
260 |
_aParis : _bIIAP, _cjuil./sept. 1982 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe author delineates a model of western administration through the concept of relative integration (regarding the European countries and the United States) by analyzing the modalities thereof by different countries. Relative integration designates a certain type of relations between the factors composing the model under a double aspect: political and administrative agencies on one part and administrative and economic agencies on the other. The relations of subordination/separation, while bringing about subordination of agencies, and the cohesion and unity of the system, prevent by maintaining the separation of agencies a total subordination of administrative agencies to political bodies, as well as of administrative agencies among themselves. In this sense, relative integration shows a clear distinction with absolute integration (cf. socialist countries) and with disintegration (cf. developing countries). From the general characteristics of the western model of administration, two variants may be distinguished: | |
520 | 3 | _a-restricted relative integration designating a strongly centralized and hierarchicized type of administration, as exemplified by the case of France; | |
520 | 3 | _a-generalized relative integration liking up with administrations characterized on the contrary by decentralizarion, dispersion, and a pronouced autonomy of their administrative structures | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g23, p. 11-50 _dParis : IIAP, juil./sept. 1982 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110107 _b1120^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20110124 _b1220^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38163 _d38163 |
||
041 | _afre |