000 | 01639naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1012615314037 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20210824062541.0 | ||
008 | 110126s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMODLIN, Steve _943860 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRationalizing the local government decision-making process : _ba model for state oversight of local government finances |
260 |
_aArmonk, NY : _bM.E. Sharpe, _cjun. 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aState prediction of local government fiscal stress has become very subjective with limited results. Not only have the mechanisms been limited in performance, but no effort has been undertaken to increase the involvement of local government officials in determining the fiscal stability within their own units using comparative data. This paper explores the use of state-sponsored fiscal indicators to predict local government solvency among rural North Carolina counties with similar governmental capacity. With increased information regarding the plight of their unit's financial stability, commissioners look to other counties as well as state directives to become more involved in the budget formulation process and remain fiscally stable | |
650 | 4 |
_aAdministração Municipal _912030 |
|
650 | 4 |
_912404 _a Tomada de Decisão |
|
650 | 4 |
_912165 _a Orçamento Público |
|
650 | 4 |
_aFinanças Públicas _912847 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aModelo de Gestão _912032 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Performance & Management Review _g33, 4, p. 571-593 _dArmonk, NY : M.E. Sharpe, jun. 2010 _xISSN 15309576 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110126 _b1531^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20110128 _b1543^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38396 _d38396 |
||
041 | _aeng |