000 | 01866naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1012615333637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211174555.0 | ||
008 | 110126s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBENJAMIN, Lehn M _943861 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMediating accountability : _bhow nonprofit funding intermediaries use performance measurement and why it matters for governance |
260 |
_aArmonk, NY : _bM.E. Sharpe, _cjun. 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPerformance measurement has become an important tool for ensuring accountability in a governance environment, where addressing public problems often takes place outside the direct purview of government. Although a good deal of attention has been given to government's use of performance measurement in these settings, either in contracting relationships or interorganizational networks, this paper argues that ensuring accountability in a governance environment requires greater attention to how nonstate actors, or the other principals, use performance measurement. This paper focuses on nonprofit funding intermediaries and their use of performance measurement. Nonprofit funding intermediaries gather funds from a range of public and private donors and regrant these monies to a defined set of local nonprofits. As such, they occupy somewhat unique positions in a web of actors all seeking to solve public problems. We offer a conceptual overview of intermediaries and then critically examine how three nonprofit funding intermediaries used performance measurement | |
650 | 4 |
_aContabilidade _913757 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aAvaliação de Desempenho _912937 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Performance & Management Review _g33, 4, p. 594-618 _dArmonk, NY : M.E. Sharpe, jun. 2010 _xISSN 15309576 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110126 _b1533^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20110128 _b1543^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38397 _d38397 |
||
041 | _aeng |