000 | 01496naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1012617035237 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190218141936.0 | ||
008 | 110126s1980 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLONG, Marceau _942897 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aLa diversification des entreprises publiques françaises |
260 |
_aParis : _bIIAP, _cjuil./sept. 1980 |
||
520 | 3 | _aNot to be confused with neighbouring concepts such as integration and affiliation, diversification obtains when an agency ventures into new activities not forming part of its traditional tasks. Considering that some operations belong to integration rather that to diversification and that other represent true diversifications but are more endured than intended, it becomes evident that actual diversifications are less frequent than it might appear and are explained by an industrial constraint common to both public and private sector, ie. the imperative of evolution which no manager can ignore whatsoever. This however presupposes in turn the possibility for such managers of enjoying at the same time a certain autonomy to fix their strategies and choose the means for reaching the planned targets. That is why autonomy of management has to be rule and State intervention only the exception | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevue Française D'Administration Publique _g15, p. 17-32 _dParis : IIAP, juil./sept. 1980 _xISSN 01527401 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110126 _b1703^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20110131 _b1607^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38423 _d38423 |
||
041 | _afre |