000 | 01742naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1031109390741 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20191016062528.0 | ||
008 | 110311s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aWORTHY, Ben _944065 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMore open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cOctober 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article examines the impact of Britain's Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000 on British central government. The article identifies six objectives for FOI in the United Kingdom and then examines to what extent FOI has met them, briefly comparing the United Kingdom with similar legislation in Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada. It concludes that FOI has achieved the core objectives of increasing transparency and accountability, though the latter only in particular circumstances, but not the four secondary objectives: improved decision-making by government, improved public understanding, increased participation, and trust in government. This is not because the Act has failed but because the objectives were overly ambitious and FOI is shaped by the political environment in which it is placed | |
650 | 4 |
_aLiberdade de Imprensa _912042 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aParticipação Social _911973 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPrestação de Contas _912154 |
|
650 | 4 |
_915163 _aCorrupção |
|
651 | 4 |
_aReino Unido _913171 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aInglaterra _913196 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g23, 4, p. 561-582 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, October 2010 _xISSN 09521895 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110311 _b0939^b _cJaqueline |
||
998 |
_a20110325 _b1546^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38704 _d38704 |
||
041 | _aeng |