000			01959naa a2200253uu 4500
001			1031109422841
003			OSt
005			20230531062537.0
008			110311s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aRABE, Barry G _933028
245	1	0	_aThe aversion to direct cost imposition : _bselecting climate policy tools in the United States
260			_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _coct. 2010
520	3		_aNumerous policy tools could be employed in attempting to mitigate climate change through reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Direct cost imposition through the taxation of carbon content of fossil fuels has long enjoyed support from diverse policy analysts but has proven highly difficult to advance politically in the United States and many other nations. This article considers the evolving American experience in climate policy tool selection, including extended engagement by many states over the past decade and growing federal involvement in recent Congresses. It demonstrates the enduring aversion to direct cost imposition as opposed to other policy options. This includes a brief period in late 2008 and early 2009 when prospects for direct cost imposition heightened markedly at the federal level but collapsed quickly in favor of a mélange of other approaches that are likely to be less efficient but also less direct in their imposition of costs. The article concludes with considerations of other methods to advance direct cost imposition in the American case
650		4	_aAquecimento Global _944066
650		4	_aPolítica Ambiental _913280
650		4	_aMeio Ambiente _912995
650		4	_aPoluição _928625
650		4	_911969 _a Política Externa
651		4	_aEstados Unidos _912942
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g23, 4, p. 583-608 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, oct. 2010 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110311 _b0942^b _cJaqueline
998			_a20110325 _b1546^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38705 _d38705
041			_apor