000 | 01677naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1031415290741 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211174643.0 | ||
008 | 110314s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGOLDFINCH, Shaun _930921 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aTwo myths of convergence in public management reform |
260 |
_aMalden : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cDecember 2010 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe literature on public management reform exhibits two intertwined convergence myths. First, a world-wide consensus on a new public management (NPM) reform agenda is seen to exist amongst policy reformers and practitioners. If this agenda is not fully implemented in all cases, this is generally explained by political and reform setbacks rather than disagreement on policy aims. Second, this NPM agenda is now seen as challenged and even abandoned and replaced by an emergent post-NPM or ‘public value leadership’ agenda and/or policy paradigm. We show the NPM convergence is overstated, with a remarkable resilience of existing institutions, and a diversity of public management systems. On the other hand, even within NPM exemplars that have putatively now adopted a post-NPM agenda, there is debate to what degree NPM has been abandoned, and over the novelty, coherence and resilience of the post-NPM agenda. Divergence and contextual variation prevail. The role of myth in policy reform is further examined | |
700 | 1 |
_aWALLIS, Joe _918075 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g88, 4, p. 1099-1115 _dMalden : Wiley-Blackwell, December 2010 _xISSN 00333298 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20110314 _b1529^b _cJaqueline |
||
998 |
_a20110317 _b1645^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38739 _d38739 |
||
041 | _aeng |