| 000 | 01909naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1031612470941 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211174746.0 | ||
| 008 | 110316s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aCAMISÓN, César _942554 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEffects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance : _bEmpirical evidence in Spain |
| 260 |
_aOxford : _bElsevier, _coct. 2010 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe question of what types of public environmental policies contribute most effectively to environmental innovation in companies remains open. This study evaluated how managerial perception of public environmental policy inspired the way in which firms act to adapt to challenges related to the natural environment, and the subsequent advancements in environmental performance of the firms. Our empirical analysis was based on data sets of environmental behaviour and the results from 1151 Spanish firms during the period 20022005. Our research concluded that each model of environmental public policy inspired different patterns of environmental adaptation by the firms. Voluntary policies, and within them those based on cooperation, were the most stimulating for the adoption of proactive environmental practices, especially those more innovative practices that may even extend beyond legal regulation. The adoption of more advanced environmental innovations by firms submitted to auto-regulation allowed both a superior improvement and a higher level of environmental performance | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aMeio Ambiente _912995 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPolítica Ambiental _913280 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aRegulação _912883 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_911941 _a Políticas Públicas |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tEuropean Management Journal _g28, 5, p. 346-361 _dOxford : Elsevier, oct. 2010 _xISSN 02632373 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20110316 _b1247^b _cJaqueline |
||
| 998 |
_a20110617 _b1350^b _cKeicielle |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38811 _d38811 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||