000			02078naa a2200241uu 4500
001			1032314471941
003			OSt
005			20241015062701.0
008			110323s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 fre d
100	1		_928355 _aBernier, Luc
245	1	0	_aRestructurer peu, restructurer mieux : _bleçons d'expériences ministérielles récents au Canada
260			_aToronto : _bIpac, _cmar./mars 2010
520	3		_aIn this article, we take a look at restructuring initiatives involving functional departments. First, we review the documented reasons leading to the decision to restructure. Next, we compare recent restructuring activities in three Canadian provinces and at the federal government level. The examples used provide us with information on the reasons for engaging in the restructuring process, and its implications. The cases reported (all territories combined) reveal that some areas seem more problematic than others (for example, economic development, environment) – that is, they are the focus of more frequent restructuring, and the subsequent outcome is not always satisfactory. The reasons for explaining the restructurings point to the complexity of the file and government priorities. Furthermore, the consequences of the restructuring process fall into three main areas: implications at the administrative and budgetary levels (costs related to moving, printing, etc.), implications revolving around the department's direction (mission and vision), and implications on personnel (loss of employment, impact on employees' morale, etc.). On a practical level, the premiers must particularly avoid the restructuring of departments during Cabinet shuffles
650		4	_911957 _a Reforma Administrativa
650		4	_912937 _aAvaliação de Desempenho
651		4	_aCanadá _913666
700	1		_aGAGNON, Stéphanie _944342
773	0	8	_tCanadian Public Administration _g53, 1, p. 21-46 _dToronto : Ipac, mar./mars 2010 _xISSN 00084840 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110323 _b1447^b _cJaqueline
998			_a20111006 _b1550^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38930 _d38930
041			_afre