| 000 | 01770naa a2200265uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1032510245741 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211174859.0 | ||
| 008 | 110325s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aHERRMANN, Svea Luise _944409 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA speaking cure for conflicts : _bproblematization, discourse stimulation and the ongoing of scientific 'progress' |
| 260 |
_aOxon : _bRoutledge, _coct. 2010 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aEmbryonic stem cell research and research cloning are issues of great public and political conflict in many countries. The author of this study analyses whether public ethical debates on these issues in Great Britain and Germany provided the grounds for societal control and political governance of the development of science. She concludes that 'ethical debates' did not counter a commitment to scientific 'progress'. On the contrary, in both countries public discourse, especially a discourse in terms of 'ethics', was a medium in which an imperative of scientific progress, on the one hand, and concerns about, or opposition to, scientific endeavor, on the other, could coexist. 'Ethical' problematizations of these issues created a discursive space for the articulation of anxiety or conflicts and the formation of an 'ethical viewpoint, without, however, challenging an imperative of scientific 'progress' | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aPesquisa Científica _912900 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_911941 _a Políticas Públicas |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aGenética _916499 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aDebate _944410 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aAnálise Comparativa _911954 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aInglaterra _913196 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aAlemanha _913168 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tCritical Policy Studies _g4, 3, p. 278-296 _dOxon : Routledge, oct. 2010 _xISSN 19460171 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20110325 _b1024^b _cJaqueline |
||
| 998 |
_a20110411 _b1539^b _cKeicielle |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c38995 _d38995 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||