000			01747naa a2200241uu 4500
001			1032510375441
003			OSt
005			20190211174904.0
008			110325s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDODGE, Jennifer _944414
245	1	0	_aTensions in deliberative practice : _ba view from civil society
260			_aOxon : _bRoutledge, _cdec. 2010
520	3		_aBased on an interpretive case study of the Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice, this article investigates deliberative democracy by taking a 'view from civil society'. It examines the Network's efforts to develop policy ideas and transmit them through diverse deliberative spheres and elaborates its 'dual strategy' through which it both collaborated with government agents in deliberative forums and took independent action outside them. Analysis of this strategy reveals two tensions in deliberative practice that the Network had to manage in order to transmit its ideas: (1) doing policy advocacy in collaboration with policy elites while staying 'bottom-up', and (2) developing policy ideas 'relevant' to decision-makers while maintaining the autonomy to be critical. These findings suggest that transmission is a complex process with four dimensions - relational, linguistic, spatial and temporal - that interact to shift power dynamics and create new meanings about policy
650		4	_aMeio Ambiente _912995
650		4	_aLegislação _912012
650		4	_aDemocracia _911984
650		4	_aParticipação Social _911973
650		4	_aSociedade Civil _912547
773	0	8	_tCritical Policy Studies _g4, 4, p. 384-404 _dOxon : Routledge, dec. 2010 _xISSN 19460171 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110325 _b1037^b _cJaqueline
998			_a20110329 _b1716^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c39000 _d39000
041			_aeng