000			01722naa a2200265uu 4500
001			1050615033837
003			OSt
005			20190211175025.0
008			110506s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLINDGREN, Karl-Oskar _944692
245	1	0	_aInput and output legitimacy : _bsynergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cjune 2010
520	3		_aSince the breakdown of the 'permissive consensus' in the early 1990s we have witnessed an input turn in the debate on EU legitimacy. Many scholars have been arguing for enhancing the input legitimacy of the EU through promoting stakeholder participation and deliberation on important European issues. Yet, others warn that this strategy might not help in increasing overall legitimacy of the EU, since increased input legitimacy could be thought to undermine its output legitimacy by making decision-making less efficient. This article assesses, empirically, the relationship between input and output legitimacy within the context of the EU chemicals policy overhaul. Contrary to what some scholars suggest, we find evidence from a survey that measures aimed at increasing the input legitimacy of the EU also hold the promise of increasing its output legitimacy
650		4	_aDemocracia _911984
650		4	_912404 _a Tomada de Decisão
650		4	_aÁrea de Livre Comércio _912994
650		4	_aLegitimidade _911982
650		4	_aStakeholder _913425
651		4	_aEuropa _912887
700	1		_aPERSSON, Thomas _944693
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g17, 4, p. 449-467 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, june 2010 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110506 _b1503^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110629 _b1511^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c39341 _d39341
041			_aeng