000			01794naa a2200277uu 4500
001			1050617170237
003			OSt
005			20190211175113.0
008			110506s2011 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGREER, Scott L _941213
245	1	0	_aDestabilization rights and restabilization politics : _bpolicy and political reactions to European Union healthcare services law
260			_aOxfordshire : _bRoutledge, _cmar. 2011
520	3		_aEuropean Union (EU) patient mobility law creates destabilization rights: rights for citizens that would, if consistently applied, destabilize law, administration and finance for healthcare systems across the EU. This article focuses on the responses of the destabilized organizations and their efforts to restabilize their legal situation. We argue that it takes place through two decisions: a decision about whether or not to change procedures in response to the new right; and a decision about whether or not to lobby to circumscribe the new right. Our qualitative research in Germany and the UK found some differences in responses, but across the board the incumbent organizations and governments opted for very limited compliance and considerable engagement in EU politics as their preferred strategy for responding to the new destabilization rights
650		4	_aPolítica de Saúde _912122
650		4	_aÁrea de Livre Comércio _912994
650		4	_aLegislação _912012
650		4	_aDireitos e Garantias Individuais _913279
651		4	_aEuropa _912887
651		4	_aAlemanha _913168
651		4	_aInglaterra _913196
700	1		_aRAUSCHER, Simone _944737
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g18, 2, p. 220-240 _dOxfordshire : Routledge, mar. 2011 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110506 _b1717^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110719 _b1000^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c39389 _d39389
041			_aeng