000			01771naa a2200241uu 4500
001			1060217045637
003			OSt
005			20190211175222.0
008			110602s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aWATT, D. J. _939269
245	1	0	_aThe relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria
260			_aOxford : _bElsevier, _cjan. 2010
520	3		_aResearch in identifying the relative importance of criteria used to select a preferred supplier has, for the most part, relied on subjective lists of criteria being presented to respondents. The research reported here uses an experimental design approach to quantify the importance of nine common criteria used in an actual evaluation and selection of a contractor/supplier. Unique choice sets were constructed, each comprising three tender evaluation outcomes (alternatives) described in terms of all criteria, but with varying levels. Respondents simultaneously evaluated all three alternatives within each choice set and selected the most preferred. Utility estimates for each criterion level were determined as was the overall contribution made by the individual criterion. Results indicate Past Project Performance, Technical Expertise and Cost are the most important criteria in an actual choice of contractor with Organisational Experience, Workload, and Reputation being the least important
650		4	_aGestão de Contratos _913064
650		4	_aModelo de Gestão _912032
650		4	_aLicitação _912856
700	1		_aKAYIS, B. _939270
700	1		_aWILLEY, K _939271
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g28, 1, p. 51-60 _dOxford : Elsevier, jan. 2010 _xISSN 02637863 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110602 _b1704^b _cDaiane
998			_a20110720 _b1553^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c39585 _d39585
041			_aeng