000			03159naa a2200265uu 4500
001			1080309445837
003			OSt
005			20240730062619.0
008			110803s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCAMERON, Robert _91732
245	1	0	_aRedefining political-administrative relationships in South Africa
260			_bSage, _cdec. 2010
520	3		_aThis article is an overview of shifting political—administrative relationships in South Africa, with particular reference to growing politicization (partisan control of the bureaucracy). Studies of politicization of public services are important because political involvement in management has often led to negative effects on service delivery. The article sets out a theoretical framework for political—administrative relationships, examining the growing politicization of public services, the impact of New Public Management (NPM) and political—administrative relationships in developing countries. It then looks at political—administrative relationships in South Africa, including the apartheid history, the development of a new framework in the democratic South Africa and politicization in the staffing of the public service. It examines three functional areas — the decentralization of powers, contract appointments and performance management — and discusses the implications of this changing framework for service delivery. The methodology consisted of interviews with a number of senior government officials, including three current directors-general and a former Minister for the Public Service and Administration, an analysis of government legislation, Public Service Commission (PSC) data including surveys, unpublished data of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA), policy papers of the African National Congress (ANC) and an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study of political involvement in bureaucracies. The article concludes that growing politicization of the public service has contributed to poor service delivery, and that the South African government needs to place greater emphasis on merit as the basis for appointments and promotions.
520	3		_aPoints for practitioners
520	3		_aThis article is useful for professionals working in public management and administration because it looks at the following debates and issues, which have practical implications: frameworks for understanding political—administrative relationships in the public service; the impact of the politicization of staff in the public service; and how merit-based appointment can improve government effectiveness. The article also offers lessons to developing countries wishing to create more professional public services.
650		4	_912662 _a Burocracia
650		4	_aGestão por Competências _912197
650		4	_911957 _a Reforma Administrativa
651		4	_aÁfrica do Sul _915792
773	0	8	_tInternational Review of Administrative Sciences _g76, 4, p. 676-701 _dSage, dec. 2010 _xISSN 00208523 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20110803 _b0944^b _cFernanda
998			_a20111004 _b1503^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c39921 _d39921
041			_aeng