000 | 01366naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1102014411141 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240226181545.0 | ||
008 | 111020s1995 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_99853 _aSharkansky, Ira |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCoping strategies of engagement and avoidance : _bthe case of Jerusalem |
260 |
_aUK : _bPolicy Press, _capr. 1995 |
||
520 | 3 | _a'Coping' has been used to describe the management of difficult problems in politics and policy making, typically without systematic concern for the various meanings of the concept. Psychologists have been more precise than political scientists in seeking to define coping. They have identified numerous coping behaviours as responses to stress, grouped them into categories, and constructed hypotheses linking coping behaviours with outcomes. While much might be learned from further specification of coping behaviours, coping is likely to remain a concept whose multiple meanings and ambiguities convey something of the setting that stimulates coping. An analysis of policy making for Jerusalem illustrates both the insights that can be derived from the concept of coping, and its limitations | |
651 | 4 |
_aChina _913345 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g23, 2, p. 91-101 _dUK : Policy Press, apr. 1995 _xISSN 03055736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20111020 _b1441^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c40659 _d40659 |
||
041 | _aeng |