000 | 01394naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1102118362241 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211175834.0 | ||
008 | 111021s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSURENDER, Rebecca _945700 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aWill doctors manage? Lessons from general practice fundholding |
260 |
_aUK : _bPolicy Press, _coct. 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aUnder the UK Conservative government, GP fundholding represented a major increase in the involvement of primary care doctors in the management of local service provision. The Labour government's proposals for Primary Care Groups extends and develops this role. This article examines the experiences of fundholding of a group of general practices which participated in an external evaluation of their work. Opinions about the merits of fundholding were varied. Doctors and managers expressed concern about the administrative burden and questionable clinical value of the scheme. Uncertainties about the overall impact upon professional autonomy were also raised. These reservations are consistent with discussions elsewhere questioning the role of doctors as managers within health care systems | |
651 | 4 |
_aChina _913345 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aFITZPATRICK, Ray _945701 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g27, 4, p. 491-502 _dUK : Policy Press, oct. 1999 _xISSN 03055736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20111021 _b1836^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c40703 _d40703 |
||
041 | _aeng |